Must Read Rumors

Beauty therapist presented as Kate Middleton’s beautician has never worked for her

Duchess Kate is admired not only for her style, but also for her beauty.

Duchess Kate stuns at Bafta awards in Alexander McQueen gown

The 2017 British Academy Film Awards ceremony brought together the world’s top actors and filmmakers in London.

Kate Middleton pregnant: bets placed on royal baby in 2017

Lately speculation has surfaced surrounding a third royal pregnancy. Should we expect royal baby no. 3 this year?

Kate Middleton themed café opens in Australia

The Duchess of Cambridge, née Kate Middleton, has become an inspiration in ways that not even the royal herself would imagine.

Beauty therapist presented as Kate Middleton’s beautician has never worked for her
Duchess Kate stuns at Bafta awards in Alexander McQueen gown
Kate Middleton pregnant: bets placed on royal baby in 2017
Kate Middleton pregnancy and surrogacy rumors denied
Kate Middleton themed café opens in Australia

Michael Douglas wins the battle over money against his ex-wife

by Nicole
November 16, 2010 at 3:27 pm

Sued by his ex-wife, Michael Douglas has just won a new fight: the one against Diandra Douglas who was seeking half of his paycheck from his last film „Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps”. The judge said no!

Actor Michael Douglas can rejoice, and sleep soundly because justice has decided to rule in his favor in a dispute with his ex-wife, Diandra Douglas. Michael and Diandra were married from 1977 to 2000 and have a son, Cameron, together.

At the time of their divorce, the couple had signed a contract stating that Michael had to share all the income from films made during their marriage with Diandra. Now she argues that since “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps” is the sequel to the first “Wall Street” movie, she is entitled to half of the actor’s paycheck.

But a Manhattan judge has dismissed her complaint without giving any justification.

Relieved, Michael Douglas said he was “very excited” about the decision. His lawyer Marilyn Chinitz said, “This case should never have been brought in the first instance and certainly not in New York.”

New York was the wrong place for the case to be heard since the couple’s divorce was finalized in California.

What do you think? What is your gossip?

The rules: Keep it clean, stay on the subject and use English only - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language email us. Read our Terms and Conditions