Stephen Hawking says the universe was “not necessary” created by God

In the new book, Stephen Hawking argues that the Big Bang was inevitable due to the law of gravity, rather than occurring following the intervention of a divine being.

22 years ago, in 1988, Hawking had a slightly different approach. In his book “A Brief History of Time” he had seemed to accept the role of God in the creation of the universe. “If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God.”

“The Grand Design”, an extract of which appears in the Times today, contests Sir Isaac Newton’s belief that the universe must have been designed by God as it could not have been created out of chaos.

“Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing,” he writes. “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.

“It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.”

“The fact that we human beings – who are ourselves mere collections of fundamental particles of nature – have been able to come this close to an understanding of the laws governing us and our universe is a great triumph.”

Hawking says the first blow to Newton’s belief that the universe could not have arisen from chaos was the observation in 1992 of a planet orbiting a star other than our Sun. “That makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions – the single sun, the lucky combination of Earth-sun distance and solar mass – far less remarkable, and far less compelling as evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings,” he writes.

Picasso creation damaged at N.Y. museum

Pablo Picasso’s painting “The Actor” will undergo repair work, due to a woman’s visit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which fell onto the painting and tore the canvas, according to the museum staff.

It seems that the Picasso work was damaged on Friday after a visitor lost her balance and fell onto the unusually large 6-foot, 4-inch work.

According to museum staff, the six-inch tear is on the lower right-hand corner of the painting.
For now we don’t have any details about the incident beyond saying the visitor fell onto the painting.

Moreover, the painting must be ready for the late April exhibition of 250 works by Picasso, according to the museum staff.

Therefore, seems that this painting marked Picasso’s move from his “Blue period” to his “Rose period,” when his creations showcased costumed acrobats reminiscent of characters in Italian comedy stage plays, said a museum source.

Image source: